Translate

Thursday, December 12, 2013

Which One is Different?

Take a look at these photographs, all taken along the same stretch of railroad, between Canyon Country and Acton, California. One of them is different from all the others. Can you tell which one is unlike all the rest?











Did you guess that photograph No. 3 is the different one? 

Yes! Photograph No. 3 shows a railroad crossing so dangerous that residents of the neighborhood it has served for almost a century are no longer allowed to cross there.

The others are okay.

I say this tongue in cheek. There has not been a single crossing accident at site No. 3 except for a woman on foot who tried to stop a freight train fifty years ago. You may have found it confusing that all the crossings are at-grade, and are regulated by stop signs. You may have been confused that one of the crossings boasts two tracks, or that some are paved and some are not; but the different one, the dangerous one, the one that fits with the unacknowledged schemes of our public officials, is ours.

        Did you notice that it is no more dangerous than the other crossings?

Actually, Federal studies of railroad crossings have found that the chance of an accident at crossings such as these is insignificant. The real crossing danger occurs at industrial sites.

In the process of "looking out for us," railroad officials created a barrier against our access to the world, which did not please us, but certainly pleased some other people who were simultaneously receiving a piece of land from Los Angeles County at our only other access point.

It will be interesting to discover just how our properties will enrich a bunch of people who don’t need to be any richer. We do not have a problem with them enriching themselves on the many hundreds of acres that have lain unoccupied for generations, but there is something about our living here, our being able to have legal access to the world, our being able to build on our own property, our being able to sell our property for what it is worth, that just gets under the skin of those acquisitive individuals.

The railroad, by the way, is intimately connected to Los Angeles County. The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors sits on the Metrolink board as well.

But what do the railroad guys get out of this? What do the Supervisors get out of this? What sort of person can face himself and his family when he selectively isolates one neighborhood and lets the others go, just because that one neighborhood is vulnerable to the bullying of public officials? How does that happen, that an entire organization is silenced?

Meantime, other public officials and other powerful members of our larger community stand by, just like the teachers and administrators who stand by and permit bullying on the playgrounds and in the halls of their schools. If you hate bullying, here is a classic example. If you are not powerful enough to intervene you can at least express your disapproval by spreading the word about this blog and our issue. Many already have and we do thank you for your moral support and assistance.

Wouldn’t it be cool if just one big railroad official, just one, stood up and said “Wait, this is wrong, and I am not going to compromise my own ethics to enrich some other guy.”?


We need your help to reach that one person.

9 comments:

  1. I like the last picture, the angle of the rails and roadway with the wall on the edge of the road. If a train is moving and a driver makes a small error it's immediate disaster. Seems this crossing should be removed as an emergency even if done on a holiday.
    Do you plan to post any contact info for railroad people? I might be tempted to click on a link and ask what are they doing. Possibly they are just not paying attention to any of this. Probably they have no idea any of this is happening or not happening.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surely somebody knows. Higher up perhaps they are just happy to reduce the number of crossings--which is a good idea but only if other nearby crossings are available. That is the intent of the truly higher-ups. For example, if there was a bridge over the tracks near an at-grade crossing, it makes sense to close the at-grade crossing. But the intent was never to isolate an entire neighborhood.
      If anyone knows an enlightened railroad official, we would appreciate getting connected. As high up as we have been able to get we have encountered small and closed minds.

      Delete
  2. The last rail crossing picture reminds me of the high speed taxi way at Van Nuys Airport, Better hope the crossing is clear before you fly across it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Reading your blog one gets the feeling L.A.Co. is lying about everything. why would they do that and what do they want to steal from you. Do you think Mike just wants to put his name on one more thing is that reason enough to steal your home

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lacking any believable explanation leads one to all sorts of ugly assumptions. I would think a public official would avoid such a situation. The most common ugly assumption is that big profits await deceitful politicians, and that they don't care how people feel about them. We would prefer to believe that those who represent us are of a better caliber.

      Delete
  4. I bet if let Antonovich put his name on your crossing he would let you use it

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is crazy!! How can they even make the argument that ours is SO dangerous anymore?!

    ReplyDelete
  6. How can anyone tell which is yours they all look alike and we see no difference in any of them

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe the way to tell is to find out which one makes speculators rich!

      Delete