Translate

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Cabins in the Woods

I love this country, always have. I come from a long line of America-lovers. I have toured—and I mean more than flown over or driven through—every state. Camped in all but one (RI), canoed the rivers of almost all, explored the capitol buildings of most (yes, including RI). It is exciting to investigate Chicago, Seattle, Anchorage and many others on foot. Public transportation in Boston, NYC, and Chicago is a trip.

But far and away my favorite parts of America are her open spaces. I especially enjoy the National Parks, the state parks, the National Forests, even BLM lands where I can paddle, hike and camp. Naturally I have been a contributor to the parks and conservancies every year, and get the junk mail to prove it.

There is a short hike in Zion National Park along Taylor Creek to the Double Arch Alcove. It takes you past two abandoned cabins, the Larson and the Fife cabins, built in the 1930s before this area was absorbed by Zion National Park. That’s about all you’ll know.

Paddling down our nation’s first National River, the Buffalo in Arkansas, you pass several abandoned homesites. Information about their former owners is sparse. You assume the residents went broke and moved.

In Montana there is a 150 mile section of the Missouri River, left intact since Lewis and Clark’s Discovery Corps came through here over two hundred years ago. You can get out and inspect several abandoned homesteads. Again, very little information is given in the guide as to why these ranches and farms lie untenanted and collapsing.

As you drive through Smoky Mountains National Park, the guide brochure points out former schoolhouses, homes, and stores. Where did those people go?

Throughout the country there are hundreds of abandoned homes on now-public land, and you can find them in parks, on preserves, and written about in books. Until now, I had assumed that these unfortunate people, who had to abandon their dreams, had simply chosen an inhospitable location, or had been bought out.

Now we have to wonder. The relocation of the American Indian, an injustice that they found fatal to resist, is a horror in American history eclipsed only by the enslavement of human beings. Stop and think that the same has been done to Japanese Americans less than 80 years ago, and you begin to wonder how many families were uprooted and tricked out of homes that lay in the path of a railroad or highway or shopping mall. And what about those cabins in the wilderness that were devoured by the machinations of an ambitious park administrator?

When I moved onto my little patch of land north of the San Gabriel Mountains I was in awe of my surroundings. I still am, by the way. I wondered, “How can I possibly own this? I do not own this; I can only cherish it and steward it for the animals and people (me) that live here.” I was proud to take over a small old stone house, rather than to carve up the land and build yet another structure. Over the years I watched Acton get chopped into smaller and smaller parcels, as city people bought, built, split and split. I was proud that our neighborhood was not turning into a suburb.

Not everyone in the community felt that way; some did build, some did split. For the most part, though, the area has maintained its outback character—partly because of the terrain, but mostly because that is how enough of us wanted it.

Yes, some did build, some did split. Was it necessary, then, for the State of California to come in here and engineer a way to trick the residents out of their property values? Aren’t there plenty of ways a heavy-handed government can prevent, or at least slow, the ticky-tackinization of a rural area, without resorting to strategies that would be illegal for a private speculator?

Besides, our area is one of the better preserved, by our own efforts, unlike many others in the County.

But this is not really about conservation, is it? This is about a handful of people making millions from a sneaky land deal, and scooping up a dozen homes for good measure—and why not? They are the government; they can do what they want.

Don’t be a dope. They are not the government; they are acquisitive people who are misusing the powers of their position to make a personal gain. And if you now think, as I once did, that people just walked away from those cabins, and that you are secure from the scheming of people who look at you and see dollar signs, you are as dumb as I was.

Are you going to wait until the gravel trucks are running down your street and you can’t stand to live there anymore and so you sell at a terrific loss, maybe to a developer in cahoots with a County or State official who happens to have directed those trucks your way? You think that can’t happen? You think they are not that creative?

Don’t be a fool. Write a letter. They’ll only scatter when the lights are on.



13 comments:

  1. I am concerned about what I see as an abuse of power supported by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. I too live in what was a horse centered community - a mostly rural community of older homes. The residents chose that rural life style dotted with older barns, sheds and farm vehicles. Lately, all of us have seen an attempt to change codes - against the desires of those residents. As troubling is the actions of the Nusience Abatement Team who have raided similar communities. In some cases suceeding on moving people off of their land because of "complaints" by neighbors. In one case the man did not even have a neighbor that could be seen from his property. None the less he was moved off his property. And what happens to those properties once they are vacant? Oh...they get sold for taxes. We all need to become involved and let the County know we are watching them and we don't like what they are doing. I don't have solid proof but my instinct is the campaign against Briggs Road residents has a similar goal. Once they are forced to abandon their property the people behind this are going to buy the "land locked - useless" property for taxes owed. I guess we have to look at who would be interested in buying that property - and look at who is supporting that campaign.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pamela thanks very much for your concern. The big question is who's next?
      You wrote, "you guess we have to look at who would be interested in buying that property". How the dirty deal works is 1st no tax default sales are advertised and 2nd, Deals are done in a back room with a wink, nod, big smile and warm feeling as "they" just screw over another poor working person. NO MONEY changes hands!!! The Conservancy a State of California agency now owns the property.

      Delete
  2. what do the people that are blocking you from your home want why would they do what they are doing do you know.

    ReplyDelete
  3. what kind of people would take your home with out paying for it if they would do something that bad to you what else have they been doing to everyone else in your county should we look up to people like or down on them who should be getting the letters you suggest people write

    ReplyDelete
  4. I totally agree with you on this, wake up and get involved.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is hard to believe this could happen to anyone let alone a group of home owners. California politician's or any politician for that matter are typically lawyers who have an understanding or perception of law, motivated by money, greed, etc. and know the average Joe is unable to stick out any long term legal action. Your only hope is to get some national spotlight news organization to put the appropriate pressure on these criminals living above the law that believe they can control the little guy. This assumes the title companies failed or gave up. All of us pay fees for services rendered by a title company; many will never understand how this could happen. This really stinks of something much larger. Wish you lots of luck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are confident that as our readership grows, we will come to the attention of such a news organization, or of a public figure with courage, power and conscience. Spread the word about our blog!

      Delete
  6. We definitely need to turn on the lights to these people. I had never thought about the homesteads that way, but it makes perfect sense, especially since those homesteads are often at the heart of these lands.

    ReplyDelete
  7. getting this story on media like Ellen Show, etc might just garner more support or financial help for the residents

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are working on that approach, and believe it, one day we will connect with the right show. Meantime, we are eager for any assistance in that direction any of our readers can offer!

      Delete
  8. one thing the cabins farms and ranches you have seen have in common with you someone wanted there land and would do anything to get it. What you may not have in common or may is did the owners get paid for there land or were they killed off the way you and your neighbors are be killed off. I don't mean shoot but it may come to that some day the people that want what you have have used violence in the pasted to get what they want. The people that want what you have believe you and your neighbors will die someday and no one will want your land locked land and homes and they will get all you had for free

    ReplyDelete
  9. Is it true that the county gave the land to the conservency? If that is true and they refuse to give you a pass through it - it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out who is behind all of this. The question is what are they offering in return? Will there magically be access once everyone is off the hill? Will it be a gated community with exclusive homes? Could there be a land developer waiting to develop the property. Everything hear smells very badly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What can we say but sniff sniff, phew!
      Thank you again for your continuing interest and support!

      Delete